Europeans Side With U.S. Over Iran on Saudi Strikes, New Deal

Europeans Side With U.S. Over Iran on Saudi Strikes, New Deal ...
bloomberg.com 24/09/2019 Politics

Keywords:#2015, #American, #Arabia, #Aramco, #Barack_Obama, #Bloomberg, #Bloomberg.com, #Boris_Johnson, #Brian_Hook, #Carnegie, #Carnegie_Endowment_for_International_Peace, #Donald_Trump, #Emmanuel_Macron, #European, #Foreign_Minister, #France, #French, #General_Assembly, #Germany, #Hassan_Rouhani, #Iran, #Iranian, #Islamic, #Islamic_Republic, #Javad_Zarif, #Mohammad_Javad_Zarif, #NBC, #New_York, #News, #Obama, #Persian, #Persian_Gulf, #Pompeo, #President, #Prime_Minister, #Rouhani, #Saudi, #Saudi_Arabia, #Saudi_Aramco, #September, #Syria, #Tehran, #Trump, #UN_General_Assembly, #Yemen

By Gregory Viscusi
By, Robert Hutton, and David Wainer
September 24, 2019
Germany, France, U.K. say Iran was clearly to blame for attack
European nations call for expanded nuclear deal with Tehran
Iran’s key European partners distanced themselves from Tehran amid rising tension with the U.S., saying the Islamic Republic was responsible for attacks on Saudi oil facilities on Sept. 14 and calling for an expanded deal to constrain the country’s nuclear and missile programs.
In a joint statement on Monday, France and Germany joined the U.K. in saying Iran was behind the attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities, adding that “no other explanation is plausible.” The statement comes just days after U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo visited Saudi Arabia on what he called a mission to build a coalition to respond to the attacks.
While reiterating their support for the 2015 nuclear accord that President Donald Trump withdrew from last year, the three nations didn’t repeat their past criticism of his decision. Instead, they said, “The moment has come for Iran to accept negotiations on a long-term framework on its nuclear program as well as on regional security, including its ballistic missiles.”
But the message of support for the agreement was muddled when U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson took Trump’s side, saying he saw faults with the existing accord.
“The reality is, as President Trump rightly said, it was a bad deal,” Johnson told NBC News, in remarks recorded before the European partners met. “It had many defects. Iran was and is behaving disruptively in the region. There’s one guy who can do a better deal and one guy who understands how to get a difficult partner like Iran over the line and that is the president. So I hope that there will be a Trump deal.”
It was unclear to what extent the prime minister’s comments reflected a difference of opinion with Germany and France and to what extent he was simply flattering his American host. Johnson’s office later tried to back away from his words, insisting he continued to support the existing nuclear accord.
Jarrett Blanc, a former coordinator on the nuclear deal under President Barack Obama and now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said it was hard to decipher the conflicting comments.
“This is not a clear message,” he said. “The Europeans have sought negotiations with Iran on these issues before. But clearly they’re trying to send a message to link everything together and tie it to this attack.”
Either way, the statement was a diplomatic victory for the U.S. Brian Hook, the American special representative for Iran, said “we were very pleased” when asked about the comments.
After Trump pulled the U.S. out of the nuclear agreement, the U.K., France and Germany tried to help the Iranians find a way around renewed and expanded U.S. sanctions, seeking to create an alternative financial mechanism to facilitate trade.
But Iranian officials repeatedly said the Europeans weren’t doing enough to help Tehran reap the economic benefits expected from the agreement, and in recent months Iran began breaching limits on nuclear enrichment.
It was unclear to what extent the prime minister’s comments reflected a difference of opinion with Germany and France and to what extent he was simply flattering his American host. Johnson’s office later tried to back away from his words, insisting he continued to support the existing nuclear accord.
Jarrett Blanc, a former coordinator on the nuclear deal under President Barack Obama and now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said it was hard to decipher the conflicting comments.
“This is not a clear message,” he said. “The Europeans have sought negotiations with Iran on these issues before. But clearly they’re trying to send a message to link everything together and tie it to this attack.”
Either way, the statement was a diplomatic victory for the U.S. Brian Hook, the American special representative for Iran, said “we were very pleased” when asked about the comments.
After Trump pulled the U.S. out of the nuclear agreement, the U.K., France and Germany tried to help the Iranians find a way around renewed and expanded U.S. sanctions, seeking to create an alternative financial mechanism to facilitate trade.
But Iranian officials repeatedly said the Europeans weren’t doing enough to help Tehran reap the economic benefits expected from the agreement, and in recent months Iran began breaching limits on nuclear enrichment.
Read More: Zarif Seeks UN Support for Gulf Security Proposal
On Monday, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted, “no new deal before compliance w/ current one.”
The nuclear agreement was long criticized by Trump and his aides for not doing more to address Iran’s ballistic missiles and “malign” behavior in the region, from Syria to Yemen. Trump and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani are in New York this week, though both sides have effectively ruled out a meeting to help lower tensions following the Aramco strike, the shooting down of an American drone and a spate of attacks on oil tankers earlier this year.
French President Emmanuel Macron met with Rouhani for two hours on Monday and told him, according to Macron’s office, that defusing the crisis was narrowly possible but that the Iranians had to act. Rouhani responded that he was willing to work with the three European countries, and to discuss the civil war in Yemen and other security issues, the French president’s office said.
Trump last week ordered a modest increase of U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf region. Iranian officials have repeatedly rejected involvement in the Aramco attack and Zarif has warned that a military strike on Iran by Saudi or U.S. forces would turn into “all-out war.”
The American president addresses the UN General Assembly on Tuesday morning and will likely discuss the situation with Iran. Rouhani is scheduled to speak to the global body on Wednesday.
— With assistance by Nick Wadhams
--- ---
...

Read more from Source »

Related articles based on keyword density
'Nothing left' if Iran hit Saudi facility: FM Zarif ...
aljazeera.com 23/09/2019 Politics
War of words over Saudi oil attacks with the US continues as Iranian leaders arrive for the UN General Assembly. 23 Sep 2019 18:01 GMT Tensions in the...View Details»

IRAN NUCLEAR TALKS STUMBLE, EXTENDED UNTIL JULY ...
hosted.ap.org 24/11/2014 News
BY MATTHEW LEE AND GEORGE JAHN ASSOCIATED PRESS VIENNA (AP) -- Still facing significant differences between the U.S. and Iran, negotiators gave up on...View Details»

Media Scam? Iran and America Join Hands in Waging “The Global War on T...
globalresearch.ca 01/07/2014 Politics
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, June 21, 2014 Following the incursion of jihadist rebels of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (IS...View Details»

'Whatever it takes': Iran crackdown killed 1,500...
news.yahoo.com 24/12/2019 Politics
A Reuters special investigation has uncovered that the death toll from last month's protests in Iran is much, much higher than initial estimates from ...View Details»

Iranian Commander Soleimani Killed in US Airstrike in Baghdad...
bloomberg.com 03/01/2020 Military
U.S. Says Airstrike Against Iranian Thwarted ‘Imminent Attack’ By Jennifer Jacobs , Zaid Sabah , and Nick Wadhams January 3, 2020, 5:22 AM GMT+3:3...View Details»


EOF