ID:5930 Section:

Updated:Monday 13th October 2014

Shahi Definition

- Shahi was an ancient Iranian unit of currency.- Shahi is the name of a vegatable. (Wikipedia) - Kabul Shahi   (Redirected from Shahi) This article is about the Hindu dynasty. For the city formerly known as Shahi, see Qa''em Shahr. For other uses, see Shahi (disambiguation).
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor''s particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (April 2013)
This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed. (April 2013)
Kabul Shahi
शाही Kabul Shahi
Vassal of Ghaznavid Empire (1010-c.1013)
AD 500s–AD 1010/1026
Capital Kabul Waihind(870–1010)
Languages Sanskrit
Religion Buddhism Hinduism
Government Monarchy
Kshayathiya Shāhi Sahanusahi
 -  700s Khingala of Kapisa
 -  964–1001 Jayapala
 -  1001–1010 Anandapala
Historical era Early Medieval India
 -  Established AD 500s
 -  Disestablished AD 1010/1026
Today part of  Afghanistan  Pakistan
Outline of South Asian history History of Indian subcontinent
Stone Age (7000–3000 BC)
Mehrgarh Culture (7000–3300 BC)
Bronze Age (3000–1300 BC)
Indus Valley Civilization (3300–1700 BC)
 – Early Harappan Culture (3300–2600 BC)
 – Mature Harappan Culture (2600–1900 BC)
Ochre Coloured Pottery culture (from 2000 BC)
Vedic period (1750–1200 BC)
 – Late Harappan Culture (1700–1300 BC)
Swat culture (1600–500 BC)
 – Black and Red ware culture (1300–1200 BC)
Iron Age (1200–26 BC)
Vedic period (1200–500 BC)
 – Black and Red ware culture (1200–1000 BC)
 – Painted Grey Ware culture (1200–600 BC)
 – Janapadas (1200–600 BC)
 – Northern Black Polished Ware (700–200 BC)
Haryanka Kingdom (684–424 BC)
 – Maha Janapadas (600–300 BC)
Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC)
 – Magadha Kingdom (500–321 BC)
Ror Kingdom (450 BC–489 AD)
Nanda Empire (424–321 BC)
Shishunaga Kingdom (413–345 BC)
Macedonian Empire (330–323 BC)
Maurya Empire (321–184 BC)
Seleucid Empire (312–63 BC)
Pandya Empire (300 BC–1345 AD)
Chera Kingdom (300 BC–1102 AD)
Chola Empire (300 BC–1279 AD)
Pallava Empire (250 BC–800 AD)
Maha-Megha-Vahana Empire (250s BC–400s AD)
Parthian Empire (247 BC–224 AD)
Satavahana Empire (230–220 BC)
Kuninda Kingdom (200s BC–300s AD)
Indo-Scythian Kingdom (200 BC–400 AD)
Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC–10 AD)
Sunga Empire (185–73 BC)
Kanva Empire (75–26 BC)
Middle Kingdoms (21–1279 AD)
Indo-Parthian Kingdom (21–130s AD)
Western Satrap Empire (35–405 AD)
Kushan Empire (60–240 AD)
Bharshiva Dynasty (170–350 AD)
Nagas of Padmavati (210–340 AD)
Sasanian Empire (224–651 AD)
Indo-Sassanid Kingdom (230–360 AD)
Vakataka Empire (250s–500s AD)
Kalabhras Empire (250–600 AD)
Gupta Empire (280–550 AD)
Kadamba Empire (345–525 AD)
Western Ganga Kingdom (350–1000 AD)
Kamarupa Kingdom (350–1100 AD)
Vishnukundina Empire (420–624 AD)
Maitraka Empire (475–767 AD)
Huna Kingdom (475–576 AD)
Rai Kingdom (489–632 AD)
Shahi Empire (500s–1026 AD)
Chalukya Empire (543–753 AD)
Maukhari Empire (550s–700s AD)
Harsha Empire (590–647 AD)
Tibetan Empire (618–841 AD)
Eastern Chalukya Kingdom (624–1075 AD)
Rashidun Caliphate (632–661 AD)
Gurjara-Pratihara Empire (650–1036 AD)
Umayyad Caliphate (661–750 AD)
Pala Empire (750–1174 AD)
Rashtrakuta Empire (753–982 AD)
Paramara Kingdom (800–1327 AD)
Yadava Empire (850–1334 AD)
Solanki Kingdom (942–1244 AD)
Western Chalukya Empire (973–1189 AD)
Lohara Kingdom (1003–1320 AD)
Hoysala Empire (1040–1346 AD)
Sena Empire (1070–1230 AD)
Eastern Ganga Empire (1078–1434 AD)
Kakatiya Kingdom (1083–1323 AD)
Kalachuri Empire (1130–1184 AD)
Late medieval period (1206–1596)
Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 AD)
 – Mamluk Sultanate (1206–1290 AD)
 – Khilji Sultanate (1290–1320 AD)
 – Tughlaq Sultanate (1320–1414 AD)
 – Sayyid Sultanate (1414–1451 AD)
 – Lodi Sultanate (1451–1526 AD)
Ahom Kingdom (1228–1826 AD)
Reddy Kingdom (1325–1448 AD)
Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646 AD)
Gajapati Kingdom (1434–1541 AD)
Deccan Sultanates (1490–1596 AD)
Early modern period (1526–1858)
Mughal Empire (1526–1858 AD)
Maratha Empire (1674–1818 AD)
Durrani Empire (1747–1823 AD)
Sikh Empire (1799–1849 AD)
Colonial period (1510–1961)
Portuguese India (1510–1961 AD)
Dutch India (1605–1825 AD)
Danish India (1620–1869 AD)
French India (1759–1954 AD)
Company Raj (1757–1858 AD)
British Raj (1858–1947 AD)
Partition of India (1947 AD)
Other states (1102–1947)
Zamorin Kingdom (1102–1766 AD)
Deva Kingdom (1200s–1300s AD)
Chitradurga Kingdom (1300–1779 AD)
Garhwal Kingdom (1358–1803 AD)
Mysore Kingdom (1399–1947 AD)
Keladi Kingdom (1499–1763 AD)
Koch Kingdom (1515–1947 AD)
Thondaiman Kingdom (1650–1948 AD)
Madurai Kingdom (1559–1736 AD)
Thanjavur Kingdom (1572–1918 AD)
Marava Kingdom (1600–1750 AD)
Sikh Confederacy (1707–1799 AD)
Travancore Kingdom (1729–1947 AD)
Kingdoms of Sri Lanka
Kingdom of Tambapanni (543–505 BC)
Kingdom of Upatissa Nuwara (505–377 BC)
Anuradhapura Kingdom (377 BC–1017 AD)
Kingdom of Ruhuna (200 AD)
Kingdom of Polonnaruwa (300–1310 AD)
Jaffna Kingdom (1215–1624 AD)
Kingdom of Dambadeniya (1220–1272 AD)
Kingdom of Yapahuwa (1272–1293 AD)
Kingdom of Kurunegala (1293–1341 AD)
Kingdom of Gampola (1341–1347 AD)
Kingdom of Raigama (1347–1415 AD)
Kingdom of Kotte (1412–1597 AD)
Kingdom of Sitawaka (1521–1594 AD)
Kingdom of Kandy (1469–1815 AD)
Portuguese Ceylon (1505–1658 AD)
Dutch Ceylon (1656–1796 AD)
British Ceylon (1815–1948 AD)
Nation histories
Regional histories
  • Assam
  • Balochistan
  • Bengal
  • Bihar
  • Gujarat
  • Himachal Pradesh
  • Kashmir
  • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
  • Rajasthan
  • Maharashtra
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Punjab
  • Odisha
  • Sindh
  • South India
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Tibet
Specialised histories
  • Coinage
  • Dynasties
  • Economy
  • Indology
  • Language
  • Literature
  • Maritime
  • Military
  • Pakistan studies
  • Science & Technology
  • Timeline
  • v
  • t
  • e

The Shahi (Devanagari: शाही), Sahi, also called Shahiya dynasties ruled one of the Middle kingdoms of India which included portions of the Kabulistan and the old province of Gandhara (now in northern Pakistan), from the decline of the Kushan Empire in the 3rd century to the early 9th century. The kingdom was known as "Kabul Shahi" (Kabul-shāhān or Ratbél-shāhān in Persian کابلشاهان یا رتبیل شاهان) between 565 and 879 AD when they had Kapisa and Kabul as their capitals, and later as Hindu Shahi.

The Shahis of Kabul/Gandhara are generally divided into the two eras of the so-called Buddhist-Shahis and the so-called Hindu-Shahis, with the change-over thought to have occurred sometime around AD 870.

  • 1 Alberuni and the myth of Turkic origin
  • 2 Kshatriya origins and Turkic influences
    • 2.1 The title of "Shahi"
  • 3 Hindu and Buddhist culture
  • 4 Invasions from the 7th century
  • 5 Move to Kabul; dynastic continuity
  • 6 Retreat and dependence on Kashmir
    • 6.1 Janjua Maharajadhiraj Jayapal
    • 6.2 Maharajadhiraj Anandpal
    • 6.3 Maharaja Trilochanpal
    • 6.4 Raja Bheempal
    • 6.5 After the loss of empire
  • 7 Shahi rulers
  • 8 See also
  • 9 Footnotes
  • 10 References

Alberuni and the myth of Turkic originCoins of the Shahis, 8th centuryCoin of Shahi Kings of Kabul & Gandhara : Samanta Deva, c. AD 850–1000. Obv: Rider bearing lance on caparisoned horse facing right. Devnagari Legends : ''bhi ''?. Rev:Recumbent bull facing left, trishula on bull''s rump, Devnagari Legends : Sri Samanta Deva.

Hsuen Tsang clearly describes the ruler of Kapisa/Kabul, whom he had personally met, as a devout Buddhist and a Kshatriya and not a Tu-kiue/Tu-kue (Turk). The Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang knew well enough what a Turk was since he had come to Kabul through their country. Against the contemporary evidence of Hsuen Tsang, an absurd tradition related by Alberuni after 400 years and with evident reluctance and disbelief in it cannot, therefore, be taken for history. The confused accounts of 11th-century Persian Muslim scholar Alberuni, ("which bear the impress of folklore for the early history of the Kabul Shahi rulers") state that:

  • the Hindu kings residing in Kabul were Turks
  • said to be of Tibetan origin
  • that the first of them was a Barahatakin (founder of the dynasty), who came (from Tibet) into the country (Kabul), entered a cave and after a few days, started to creep out of it in the presence of people who looked upon him as a "new born baby", clothed in Turkish dress. People honoured him as a being of miraculous birth, destined to be a king. And he brought those countries under his sway and ruled under the title of Shahiya of Kabul
  • the rule remained among his descendants for about sixty generations, till it was supplanted by a Hindu minister and
  • in this series of his descendant rulers, one was Kanik (Kanishaka?) who is said to have built Vihara in Purushapura, which is called Kanika Caitya.

Thus the folklore accounts recorded by Alberuni connect the earlier Shahis of Kabul/Kapisa to Turkish extraction and also claim their descent from Kanik (or Kanishaka of Kushana lineage). At the same time it is also claimed that ''their first king Barahatigin (Vrahitigin?) had originally come from Tibet and concealed in a narrow cave in Kabul area (and here is given a strange legend which we omit).'' One can easily see the above account of Shahi origin as totally fanciful and fairy tale-like. These statements taken together are very confusing, inconsistent and bear the express marks of a folklore and vulgar tradition, hence unworthy of inspiring any confidence in the early history of Shahis. The allegation that the first dynasty of Kabul was Turki is plainly based on the vulgar tradition, which Alberuni himself remarked was clearly absurd.

Based on Alberuni''s accounts, V. A. Smith speculates that the earlier Shahis were a cadet branch of the Kushanas who ruled both over Kabul and Gandhara until the rise of the Saffarids. H. M. Elliot relates the early Kabul Shahis to the Kators and further connects the Kators with the Kushanas. Charles Frederick Oldham also traces the Kabul Shahi lineage to the Kators—whom he identifies with the Kathas or Takkhas—Naga worshipping collective groups of Hinduism (Sun god-worshiping) lineage. He further speaks of the Urasas, Abhisaras, Daradas, Gandharas, Kambojas, et al. as allied tribal groups of the Takkhas belonging to the Sun-worshiping races of the north-west frontier. D. B. Pandey traces the affinities of the early Kabul Shahis to the Hunas.

The accounts recorded by Alberuni are indeed confusing, but other numerous accounts prove the Kshatriya Punjabi origins of the Shahi dynasty. Hsuen Tsang clearly describes the ruler of Kapisa/Kabul, whom he had personally met, as a devout Buddhist and a Kshatriya and not a Tu-kiue/Tu-kue (Turk). The fact that Xuanzang (AD 644) specifically describes the ruler of Kapisa as Ksatriya, and that of Zabul at this time being known as Shahi casts serious doubt about the speculated connections of the first Shahis of Kabul/Kapisa to the Kushanas or the Hephthalites. Neither the Kushanas nor the Hunas/Hephthalites nor the Turks (or Turushakas) have ever been designated or classified as Ksatriyas in any ancient Indian tradition. Therefore, the identification of the first line of Shahi kings of Kapisa/Kabul with the Kushanas, Hunas, or Turks obviously seems to be in gross error.

It is very interesting that Alberuni calls the early Shahi rulers Turks, but this should be interpreted to mean Turkised rather than Turkic.

Kshatriya origins and Turkic influences

The Shahi rulers of Kapisa/Kabul who ruled Afghanistan from the early 4th century till AD 870 were Hindu Kamboj Kshatriyas. The Shahis of Afghanistan were discovered in 1874 to be connected to the Kamboja "race" by E. Vesey Westmacott.

E. Vesey Westmacott, Bishan Singh, K. S. Dardi, et al. connect the Kabul Shahis to the ancient Indian Ksatriya clans of the Kambojas/Gandharas. George Scott Robertson writes that the Kators/Katirs of Kafiristan belong to the well known Siyaposh tribal group of the Kams, Kamoz and Kamtoz tribes. But numerous scholars now also agree that the Siyaposh tribes of Hindukush are the modern representatives of the ancient Iranian cis-Hindukush Kambojas.

The powerful evidence from Hsuen Tsang (AD 644) attesting that the ruler of Kabul/Kapisa was a devout Buddhist and belonged to Ksatriya caste would rather connect this ruling dynasty either to the erstwhile Gandharas or more probably to Ashvaka clan of the Kambojas, the eminent Ksatriya clan of the Mauryan times from the neighbouring region in India.

The name (Katorman or Lagaturman) of the last king of the so-called first Shahi line of Kabul/Kapisa simply reveals a trace of Tukhara cultural influence in the Kamboja (Kapisa) region, as hinted in the above discussion. Thus, the first ruling dynasty of Kapisa and Kabul, designated as a Ksatriya dynasty by Hsuen Tsang had been a Kamboja dynasty from India.

Asia in AD 565, showing the Shahi kingdoms and their neighbours.

From the 2nd century BC onwards (much prior to the Huna ascendancy), the Tukharas had settled in considerable numbers in the ancient Kamboja land and thus the culture of the Kambojas undoubtedly underwent some changes and due to the interaction of two cultures, the Kambojas of Kapisa were also substantially influenced by Tukharas who remained for quite a time the ruling power in this region.

This fact is also verified by Hiuen Tsang who records that the literature, customary rules, and currency of Bamiyan were same as those of Tukhara; the spoken language is only little different and in personal appearance the people closely resembled those of the Tukhara country. On the other hand, the literature and written language of Kapisa (=Kamboja) was like that of Tukharas but the social customs, colloquial idiom, rules of behavior (and their personal resemblance) differed somewhat from those of Tukhara country which means that the original and dominant community of Kapisa had imbibed the Tukharan culture and customs but to a limited extent and the penetration of the Tukharas in the Kapisa territory appears to have therefore been also limited. The Kambojas and the Tukharas (Turks) are mentioned as immediate neighbors in north-west as late as the 8th century AD as Rajatarangini of Kalhana demonstrates.

Evidence also exists that some medieval Muslim writers have confused the Kamboja clans of Pamirs/Hindukush with the Turks and invested the former with Turkic ethnicity. For example, 10th-century Arab geographer Al-Muqaddasi, refers to the Kumiji (=Kamoji/Kamboja) tribesmen of Buttaman mountains (Tajikstan), on upper Oxus, and calls them of Turkic race. Song Yun, the Chinese Ambassador to the Huna kingdom of Gandhara, in AD 520 writes that the Yethas (Hephthalites) had invaded Gandhara two generations prior to him and had completely destroyed this country. The then Yetha ruler was extremely cruel, vindictive, and anti-Buddhist and had engaged in a three years border war with the king of Ki-pin (Cophene or Kapisa), disputing the boundaries of that country. The Yetha king referred to by Song Yun may have been Mihirakula (AD 515-540/547) or his governor. This evidence also proves that the Kapisa kingdom was well established prior to the Huna/Hephthalite invasion of Gandhara (c. AD 477) and that it did not submit to the Yethas but had survived and continued to maintain its independence.

Newly excavated Buddhist stupa at Mes Aynak in Logar Province. Similar stupas have been discovered in neighbouring Ghazni Province, including in the northern Samangan Province.

Once the political clout of the invaders like the Kushanas or the Hephthalites had declined, some native chieftain from the original dominant clans of this region seems to have attained ascendancy in political power and established an independent kingdom on the ruins of the Kushana and/or the Hephthalite empire.

Commenting on the rise of Shahi dynasty in Kabul/Kapisa, Charles Frederick Oldham observes: "Kabulistan must have passed through many vicissitudes during the troublous times which followed the overthrow of the great Persian empire by the Alexander. It no doubt fell for a time under the sway of foreign rulers (Yavanas, Kushanas, Hunas etc). The great mass of the population, however, remained Zoroastrian and Polytheists. And probably too, the Kshatriya chiefs from India retained great shadow of authority, and conquered Kabulistan when the opportunity arose.".

Barhatigin is said to be the founder of the dynasty which is said to have ruled for 60 generations until AD 870. This, if true, would take Barhatigin and the founding of the early Shahi dynasty back about 20x60=1200 years, i.e., to about the 4th century BC if we take the average generation of 20 years; and to the 7th century BC if an average generation is taken as 25 years. It is well nigh impossible that a single dynasty could have ruled for 1200 (or 1500) years at a stretch. Moreover, King Kanik (if Kanishaka) ruled (AD 78 – 101) not over Kabul but over Purushapura/Gandhara and his descendants could not have ruled for almost 900 years as a single dynasty over Kapisa/Kabul especially in a frontier region called the gateway of India. Pre Islamic Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan is well established in the Shahi coinage from Kabul of this period.

Based on fragmentary evidence of coins, there was one king named Vrahitigin (Barhatigin?) who belonged to pre-Christian times as Alberuni''s accounts would tend to establish. If Kanik is same as Kanishaka of Kushana race as is often claimed, then the second claim that the ancestors of the early Shahis came from Tibet becomes incompatible to known facts of history.

According to Olaf Caroe, "the earlier Kabul Shahis in some sense were the inheritors of the Kushana chancery tradition and were staunch Hindus in character. The affinities of the early Shahis of Kapisa/Kabul are still speculative, and the inheritance of the Kushan-Hephthalite chancery tradition and political institutions by Kabul Shahis do not necessarily connect them to the preceding dynasty (i.e. the Kushanas or Hephthalites).

It appears that from start of the 5th century till AD 793-94, the capital of the Kabul Shahis was Kapisa. As early as AD 424, the prince of Kapisa (Ki-pin of the Chinese) was known as Guna Varman. The name ending "Varman" is used after the name of a Ksahriya only. Thus the line of rulers whom Hiuen Tsang refers to in his chronicles appears to be an extension of the Ksatriya dynasty whom this Guna Varman of Ki-pin or Kapisa (AD 424) belonged. Thus this Ksatriya dynasty was already established prior to AD 424 and it was neither a Kushana nor a Hephthalite dynasty by any means.

Abbasid Shahi-inspired coin, Iraq 908–930. British Museum.

It appears more than likely that, rather than the Kushanas or Hunas or the Turks, the Shahi rulers of Kabul/Kapisa and Gandhara had a descent from the neighbouring warlike Ksatriya clans of the Kambojas known as Ashvakas (q.v.), who in the 4th century BC, had offered stubborn and decisive resistance to Macedonian invader, Alexander, and later had helped Chandragupta Maurya found the Mauryan empire of India. They were the same bold and warlike people on whom king Ashoka Maurya had thought it wise and expedient to bestow autonomous status and to whom he gave eminent place in his Rock Edicts V and XIII. They were fiercely independent warlike people who had never easily yielded to any foreign overlord. They were the people who, in the 5th century AD, had formed the very neighbours of the Bactrian Ephthalites of Oxus and whom Chandragupta II of Gupta dynasty had campaigned against and had obtained tribute from about the start of the 5th century AD. Dr V. A. Smith says that this epic verse is reminiscent of the times when the Hunas first came into contact with the Sassanian dynasty of Persia. And the Monghyr grant of king Devapala of the Pala dynasty of Bengal attests that the great king had led his war expedition (AD 810–850) into the northwest against the Hunas (in western Punjab) and then the Kambojas (in the Kabul/Gandhara valleys. Sata-pañcāśaddesa-vibhaga of the medieval era Tantra book Saktisamgma Tantra locates Kambojas (Kabul Shahis?) to the west of southwest Kashmir (or Pir-pañcāla), to the south of Bactria and to the east of Maha-Mlechcha-desa (=Mohammadan countries i.e Khorasan/Iran) and likewise, locates the Hunas (Zabul Shahis?) to the south of Kama valley (or Jallalabad/Afghanistan) and to the north of Marudesa (or Rajputana) towards western Punjab.

The Kavyamimasa of Rajshekhar also lists the Sakas, Kekayas, Kambojas, Vanayujas, Bahlikas, Hunas, Pahlvas, Limpakas, Harahuras, Hansmaragas (Hunzas) etc in the north-west. Since Rajshekhar (AD 880–920) was contemporary with Hindu Shahis, he identifies people called Kambojas (Kabul/Kapisa), Vanayujas (Bannus), Limpakas (Lamghanis), Hunas (Zabul), Pahlvas (Persians—Maha-mlechchas), Harahuras (Red Hunas located in Herat) etc almost exactly in the same localities which were occupied by Kabul Shahi and Zabul Shahi kingdoms respectively. The above referred to pieces of evidence again spotlight on the Kambojas and the Hunas together and places them near the environs of the Muslim Persians in north-west. During the 1st century AD and later in the 5th century (c. AD 477), the cis-Hindukush Kambojas and Gandharas partially came under the sway of foreign invaders like the Kushanas and the Hephthalites (Hunas). These warlike people were temporarily overpowered by the numerous hordes but they did not become extinct; and once the political tide of the foreign hordes ebbed, someone from the native chieftains from the original dominant clans (i.e. the Ksatrya Ashvakas) of this region asserted his authority and attained ascendancy in political power and had established himself as Ksatriya overlord of an independent kingdom on the ruins of the erstwhile Kushana and/or the Hephthalites empire. Having been exposed to the foreign environs for a while and having also, in a sense, inherited the Kushana-Hephthalite chancery tradition of their predecessors, these native cis-Hindukush Kamboja/Gandhara rulers had also adopted their political institutions and regal titles such as "shahi" and "tegin" etc in the same way as the Sakas, Kushanas, and Hunas had earlier adopted a form of the Persian Kshathiya/Kshathiya title from their predecessors—the Achamenids of Persia.

The title of "Shahi"

In ancient time, the title Shahi appears to be a quite popular royal title in Afghanistan and the north-western areas of the Indian sub-continent. It was used by Achaemenids Sakas, Kushanas, Hunas, Bactrians, by the rulers of Kapisa/Kabul, and Gilgit. In Persian form, the title appears as Kshathiya, Kshathiya Kshathiyanam, Shao of the Kushanas and the Ssaha of Mihirakula (Huna chief). The Kushanas are stated to have adopted the title Shah-in-shahi ("Shaonano shao") in imitation of Achaemenid practice.

An ancient Jaina work, Kalakacarya-kathanaka, says that the rulers of the Sakas who had invaded Ujjaini/Malwa in 62 BC also used the titles of Sahi and Sahnusahi. Since the title Shahi was used by the rulers of Kapisa/Kabul or Gandhara also in imitation of Kushana "Shao", it has been speculated by some writers that the Shahi dynasty of Kapisa/Kabul or Gandhara was a foreign dynasty and had descended from the Kushans or Turks (Turushkas). However, the title has been used by several rulers irrespective of any racial connotations and this may refute the above speculation.

In addition, one ancient inscription and several ancient Buddhist manuscripts from the Gilgit area between upper Indus and river Kabul shed some light on the three kings who ruled in the Gilgit region in the 6th and 7th centuries AD. They also bore Shahi titles and their names are mentioned as Patoladeva alias Navasurendradiyta Nandin, Srideva alias Surendra Vikrmadiyta Nandin and Patoladeva alias Vajraditya Nandin. It is very relevant to mention here that each of the Shahi rulers mentioned in the above list of Gilgit rulers has Nandin as his surname or last name It is more than likely that the surname Nandin refers to their clan name. It is also very remarkable that the modern Kamboj tribe of northern Punjab still has Nandan (Nandin) as one of their important clan names. It is therefore very likely that these Gilgit rulers of upper Indus may also have belonged to the Kamboja lineage. Furthermore, "Shahi, Sahi, Shahiya" as a septal name is still carried by a section of the Punjab Kambojs which appears to be a relic from the Shahi title of their Kabul/Kapisa princes.

Hindu and Buddhist culture6th-century "image of Hindu deity, Ganesha, consecrated by the Shahi King Khingala." found at Gardez, Afghanistan

Alberuni''s reference to the supplanting of the Kabul Shahi dynasty in about AD 870 by a Brahmin called Kallar actually implies only that the religious faith of the royal family had changed from Buddhism to Hinduism by about that date; it might not have actually involved any physical supplanting of the existing Kabul Shahi dynasty as is stated by Alberuni whose account of early Shahis is indeed based on telltale stories.

Archeological sites of the period, including a major Hindu Shahi temple north of Kabul and a chapel in Ghazni, contain both the pre-dominant Hindu and Buddhist statuary, suggesting that there was a close interaction between the two religions.

When the Chinese visitor Hsuan-tsang visited Kapisa (about 60 km north of modern Kabul) in the 7th century, the local ruler was a Kshatriya King Shahi Khingala. A Ganesha idol has been found near Gerdez that bears the name of this king, see Shahi Ganesha.

Several 6th- or 7th-century AD Buddhist manuscripts were found from a stupa at Gilgit. One of the manuscripts reveals the name of a Shahi king Srideva Sahi Surendra Vikramaditya Nanda.

See also: Pre Islamic Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan Invasions from the 7th century

In the wake of Muslim invasions of Kabul and Kapisa in second half of the 7th century (AD 664), the Kapisa/Kabul ruler called by Muslim writers Kabul Shah (Shahi of Kabul) made an appeal to the Ksatriyas of the Hind who had gathered there in large numbers for assistance and drove out the Muslim invaders as far as Bost. This king of Kapisa/Kabul who faced the Muslim invasion was undoubtedly a Ksatriya.

In AD 645, when Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang was passing through the Uttarapatha, Udabhanda or Udabhandapura was the place of residence or secondary capital of emperor of Kapisa which then dominated over 10 neighboring states comprising Lampaka, Nagara, Gandhara and Varna (Bannu) and probably also Jaguda. About Gandhara, the pilgrim says that its capital was Purushapura; the royal family was extinct and country was subject to Kapisa; the towns and villages were desolate and the inhabitants were very few. It seems that under pressure from Arabs in the southwest and the Turks in the north, the kings of Kapisa had left their western possessions in the hands of their viceroys and made Udabhanda their principal seat of residence. The reason why Udabhandapura was selected in preference to Peshawar is at present unknown but it is possible that the new city of Udabhanda was built by Kapisa rulers for strategic reasons.

In AD 671 Muslim armies seized Kabul and the capital was moved to Udabhandapura, where they became known as the Rajas of Hindustan.

Move to Kabul; dynastic continuity

In subsequent years, the Muslim armies returned with large reinforcements and Kabul was swept when the Shahi ruler agreed to pay tribute to the conquerors. For strategical reasons, the Shahis, who continued to offer stubborn resistance to Muslim onslaughts, finally moved their capital from Kapisa to Kabul in about AD 794. Kabul Shahis remained in Kabul until AD 879 when Ya''qub-i Laith Saffari, the founder of the Saffarid dynasty, conquered the city. Kabul Shahis had built a defensive wall all around the Kabul city to protect it against the army of Muslim Saffarids. The remains of these walls are still visible over the mountains which are located inside the Kabul city.

The first Hindu Shahi dynasty was founded in AD 870 by Kallar (see above). Kallar is well documented to be a Brahmin. The kingdom was bounded on the north by the Hindu kingdom of Kashmir, on the east by Rajput kingdoms, on the south by the Muslim Emirates of Multan and Mansura, and on the west by the Abbasid Caliphate.

According to the confused accounts recorded by Alberuni which are chiefly based on folklore, the last king of the first Shahi dynasty, Lagaturman (Katorman) was overthrown and imprisoned by his Brahmin vizier Kallar, thus resulting in the change-over of dynasty.

The Hindu Shahi, a term used by history writer Al-Biruni to refer to the ruling Hindu dynasty that took over from the Turki Shahi and ruled the region during the period prior to Muslim conquests of the 10th and 11th centuries.

The term Hindu Shahi was a royal title of this dynasty and not its actual clan or ethnological name. Al-Biruni used the title Shah for many other contemporary royal houses in his descriptions as well.

It is very remarkable that Kalhana (c. 12th century), the author of Rajatarangini (written in AD 1147–49), also refers to the Shahis and does not maintain any difference or distinction between the earlier Shahis (RT IV.143) and the later Shahis or does not refer to any supplanting of the dynasty at any stage as Alberuni does in his Tarikh-al-Hind. etc., unbroken to as far as or earlier than AD 730. It is also remarkable that Rajatrangini and all other sources refer to the Shahi rulers of Udabhandapura/Waihind as belonging to the Kshatriya lineage in contrast to Alberuni who designates the earlier Shahi rulers as Turks and the later as Brahmins

Since the change of Shahi capital from Kabul to Waihind or Uddhabhandapura had also occurred precisely around this period, it is probable that the narrator of the folklore/tellatale to Alberuni had confused the "change of capital" issue with the "supplanting of Kabul Shahi dynasty" since the incidence of shift had occurred remotely about 200 years prior to Alberuni''s writing (AD 1030). There is no doubt, as the scholars also admit, that the change in dynasty is effected by "a common legend of eastern story", which surely bears the express mark of folklore for the previous history of Kabul Shahis, hence obviously speculative and not much worthy of serious history.

See also: History of Arabs in Afghanistan Retreat and dependence on Kashmir

The Hindu Shahis became engaged with the Yamini Turks of Ghazni over supremacy of the eastern regions of Afghanistan initially before it extended towards the Punjab region. They briefly recaptured the Kabul Valley from the Samanid successors of the Saffarids, until a general named Alptigin drove out the Samanid wali of Zabulistan and established the Ghaznavid dynasty at Ghazna. Under his general and successor Sabuktigin the Ghaznavids had begun to raid the provinces of Lamghan. and Multan. This precipated an alliance first between the then King Jayapala and the Amirs of Multan, and then in a second battle in alliance with Delhi, Ajmer, Kalinjar, and Kannauj which saw the Hindu Shahi lose all lands west of the Indus River. His successor Anandapala arrived at a tributary arrangement with Sebuktigin''s successor, Mahmud of Ghazni, before he was defeated and exiled to Kashmir in the early 11th century.

Al-Idirisi (AD 1100-1165/66) testifies that until as late as the 12th century, a contract of investiture for every Shahi king was performed at Kabul and that here he was obliged to agree to certain ancient conditions which completed the contract. Kalhana remarked: "To this day, the appellation Shahi throws its lustre on a numberless host of kshatriya abroad who trace their origin to that family".

The kings of Kashmir were related to the Shahis through marital and political alliance. Didda, a queen of Kashmir was a granddaughter of the Brahmin Shahi Bhima, who was married to Kshemagupta (r. 951–959). Bhima had visited Kashmir and built the temple Bhima Keshava.

Janjua Maharajadhiraj Jayapal

The initial Hindu Shahi dynasty was the House of Kallar, but in AD 964 the rule was assumed from Bhima upon his death by the Janjua emperor Maharajadiraja Jayapala, son of Rai Asatapala Janjua . Epithets from the Bari Kot inscriptions record his full title as "Parambhattaraka Maharajadhiraja Paramesvara Sri Jayapala deva" the first Emperor of the Janjua Shahi phase. He is celebrated as a hero for his struggles in defending his kingdom from the Turkic rulers of Ghazni.

Emperor Jayapala was challenged by the armies of Sultan Sabuktigin in Battle of Peshawar (1001) and later by his son Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni. According to the Minháj ad-Dīn in his chronicle Tabaqát-i Násiri, he bears a testament to the political and powerful stature of Maharaja Jayapala Shah, "Jayapála, who is the greatest of all the ráis (kings) of Hind..." Misra wrote on Jaypala: "(He) was perhaps the last Indian ruler to show such spirit of aggression, so sadly lacking in later Rajput kings."

Maharajadhiraj Anandpal

Prince Anandapala who ascended his father''s throne (in about March/April AD 1002) already proved an able warrior and general in leading many battles prior to his ascension. According to ''Adáb al-Harb'' (pp. 307–10) in about AD 990, it is written, "the arrogant but ambitious Raja of Lahore Bharat, having put his father in confinement, marched on the country of Jayapála with the intention of conquering the districts of Nandana, Jailum (Jehlum) and Tákeshar" (in an attempt to take advantage of Jayapala''s concentrated effort with defence against the armies of Ghazni). "Jayapala instructed Prince Anandapala to repel the opportunist Raja Bharat. Anandapala defeated Bharat and took him prisoner in the battle of Takeshar and marched on Lahore and captured the city and extended his father''s kingdom yet further."

However, during his reign as emperor many losses were inflicted on his kingdom by the Ghaznavids. During the battle of Chach between Mahmud and Anandapala, it is stated that "a body of 30,000 Gakhars fought alongside as soldiers for the Shahi Emperor and incurred huge losses for the Ghaznavids". However, despite the heavy losses of the enemy, he lost the battle and suffered much financial and territorial loss. This was Anandapala''s last stand against Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni. He eventually signed a treaty with the Ghaznavid Empire in AD 1010 and shortly a year later died a peaceful death. R.C Majumdar (D.V. Potdar Commemoration Volume, Poona 1950, p. 351) compared him ironically to his dynastic ancient famous ancestor "King Porus, who bravely opposed Alexander but later submitted and helped in subduing other Indian rulers". And Tahqíq Má li''l-Hind (p. 351) finally revered him in his legacy as "noble and courageous" .

Maharaja Trilochanpal

Prince Trilochanpála, the son of Anandapala, ascended the imperial throne in about AD 1011. Inheriting a reduced kingdom, he immediately set about expanding his kingdom into the Sivalik Hills, the domain of the Rai of Sharwa. His kingdom now extended from the River Indus to the upper Ganges valley. According to Al-Biruni, Tirlochanpála "was well inclined towards the Muslims (Ghaznavids)" and was honourable in his loyalty to his father''s peace treaty to the Ghaznavids. He eventually rebelled against Sultan Mahmud and was later assassinated by some of his own mutinous troops in AD 1021–22, an assassination which was believed to have been instigated by the Rai of Sharwa who became his arch-enemy due to Tirlochanpala''s expansion into the Siwalik ranges. He was romanticised in Punjabi folklore as the Last Punjabi ruler of Punjab.

Raja Bheempal

Prince Bhímapála, son of Tirlochanpala, succeeded his father in AD 1021–22. He was referred to by Utbí as "Bhīm, the Fearless" due to his courage and valour. Considering his kingdom was at its lowest point, possibly only in control of Nandana, he admirably earned the title of "fearless" from his enemy''s own chronicle writer. He is known to have commanded at the battle of Nandana personally and seriously wounded the commander of the Ghaznavid army Muhammad bin Ibrahim at-Tāī (''Utbi, vil.ii, p. 151.). He ruled only five years before meeting his death in AD 1026. He was final Shahi Emperor of the famed dynasty.

Kalhana, a 12th-century Kashmiri Brahmin, wrote of one campaign in the process that led to this collapse.

After the loss of empire

His sons Rudrapal, Diddapal, Kshempala, and Anangpala served as generals in Kashmir. They gained prominence in the Kashmiri royal court where they occupied influential positions and intermarried with the royal family. Hindu Kashmir had aided the Hindus Shahis against Mahmud of Ghazni. As a result after barely defeating the Hindu Shahis, Mahmud marched his men to Hindu Kashmir to take revenge for Kashmir''s support of the Hindu Shahis. However, twice Mahmud was soundly defeated by the Kashmiris and had to lick his wounds. He never was able to take on Hindu Kashmir. All sources, including the famous Al-Biruni, accept this. Al-Biruni was with Mahmud on these campaigns. They are mentioned frequently in Rajatarangini of Kalhana written during AD 1147–49. Rudrapal was mentioned by the writer Kalhana as a valiant general in the campaigns he led to quell resistance to the Kashmiran kings whom they served whilst in exile. His later descendants fell out of favour at the royal court and were exiled to the Siwalik Hills, retaining control of the Mandu fort. After a brief period, they rose again to take control of Mathura under Raja Dhrupet Dev in the 12th century before the campaigns of the Ghorid Empire.

The Janjua Rajputs of Punjab are the descendants of the House of Jayapala.

Shahi rulers History of Afghanistan
Indus valley civilization 2200–1800 BC
Oxus civilization 2100–1800 BC
Aryans 1700–700 BC
Medes 728–550 BC
Achaemenids 550–330 BC
Seleucids 330–150 BC
Mauryans 305–180 BC
Greco-Bactrians 256–125 BC
Indo-Greeks 180–130 BC
Indo-Scythians (Sakas) 155–80? BC
Indo-Parthians 20 BC – 50? AD
Kushans 135 BC – 248 AD
Sasanians 230–651
Kidarites 320–465
Hephthalites 410–557
Kabul Shahi 565–879
Principality of Chaghaniyan 7th–8th centuries
Rashidun Caliphate 652–661
Umayyads 661–750
Abbasids 750–821
Tahirids 821–873
Saffarids 863–900
Samanids 875–999
Ghaznavids 963–1187
Ghurids before 879–1215
Khwarezmids 1215–1231
Ilkhanate 1258–1353
Chagatai Khanate 1225–1370
Khiljis 1290–1320
Karts 1245–1381
Timurids 1370–1506
Arghuns 1479–1522
Mughals 1501–1738
Safavids 1510–1709
Hotaki Empire 1709–1738
Durrani Empire 1747–1826
Emirate of Afghanistan 1826–1919
Kingdom of Afghanistan 1919–1973
Republic of Afghanistan 1973–1978
Democratic Republic of Afghanistan 1978–1992
Islamic State of Afghanistan 1992–2001
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan 1996–2001
Interim/Transitional Administration 2001–2004
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan since 2004
  • Book
  • Category
  • Portal
  • v
  • t
  • e
  • Khingala of Kapisa (7th century)
  • Patoladeva alias Navasurendradiyta Nandin of Gilgit (6th–7th century)
  • Srideva alias Surendra Vikrmadiyta Nandin of Gilgit (6th–7th century)
  • Patoladeva alias Vajraditya Nandin of Gilgit (6th–7th century)
  • Kallar alias Lalliya (c. 890–895) of Kabul
  • Kamaluka (895–921)
  • Bhima (921–964), son of Kamaluka
  • Ishtthapala (?)
  • Jayapala (964–1001)
  • Anandapala (1001 - c. 1010), son of Jayapala
  • Trilochanapala (ruled c. 1010 - 1021-22; assassinated by mutinous troops)
  • Bhímapála (died in 1022–1026)
See also
  • List of Indian monarchs
  • Pre-Islamic period of Afghanistan (Before 650 AD)
  • Kushanshas or Indo-Sassanians
  • Hephthalites
  • Kushano-Hephthalite or Kabul Turk-Shahi Dynasty (565–870 AD)
  • Janjua
  • Gandhara
  • Kabulistan
  • Turushka
  • ^ André Wink, Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam: 7th-11th Centuries, (Brill, 2002), 125. ISBN 9780391041257 – via Questia (subscription required)
  • ^ as in: Rajatarangini, IV, 140-43, Kalahana.
  • ^ as in inscriptions: See: Hindu Sahis of Afghanistan and the Punjab, 1972, p 111, Yogendra Mishra.
  • ^ as in: Tarikh-al-Hind, trans. E. C. Sachau, 1888/1910, vol ii, pp 10, Abu Rihan Alberuni; Sehrai, Fidaullah (1979). Hund: The Forgotten City of Gandhara, p. 1. Peshawar Museum Publications New Series, Peshawar.
  • ^ a b c Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006. "Shahi Family".
  • ^ a b Kohzad, Ahmad Ali, "Kabul Shāhāni Berahmanī", 1944, Kabul
  • ^ Sehrai, Fidaullah (1979). Hund: The Forgotten City of Gandhara, p. 2. Peshawar Museum Publications New Series, Peshawar.
  • ^ The Pathans, 1958, p 108, 109, Olaf Caroe.
  • ^ Abu Rihan Alberuni Tarikh-al-Hind, trans. E. C. Sachau, 1888/1910, vol ii, pp. 10–14.
  • ^ Charles Frederick Oldham The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, pp. 113-126,  — Serpent worship.
  • ^ Important Note: Urasa, Rajauri/Poonch and Abhisara were off-shoots of ancient Kamboja (see: Political History of Ancient India, 1996, p 133, 219/220, Dr H. C. Raychaudhury, Dr B. N. Mukerjee; A History of India, p 269-71, N. R. Ray, N. K. Sinha; Journal of Indian History, 1921, P 304, University of Allahabad, Department of Modern Indian History, University of Kerala).
  • ^ Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya History of Mediaeval Hindu India, 1979, p 200.
  • ^ Si-Yu-KI V1: Buddhist Records of the Western World, Edition 2006, pp. 54-55, Hsuen Tsang; The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, p. 120, Charles Frederick Oldham – Serpent worship; The Shahis of Afghanistan and the Punjab, 1973, p 17, Deena Bandhu Pandey; The History and Culture of the Indian People, 1977, p 165, Dr Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Dr A. D. Pusalkar — India.
  • ^ Dr Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Dr A. D. Pusalkar The History and Culture of the Indian People, 1977, p. 165.
  • ^ History of Mediaeval Hindu India, 1979, p. 200, Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya — India.
  • ^ "The view that Nepali Traditions apply name Kamboja Desha to Tibet is based on the statement made by Foucher (Ref: Étude sur l''Iconographie bouddhique de l''Inde, pp 134–135, A. Foucher) on the authority of Ranga Nath, Pandit to B. H. Hodgson. But it is also supported by two manuscripts described in the Catalogue of Sanskrit and Prakrit Mss in the library of India Office, Vol II, Part II." (Refs: History of Bengal, I, 191, Dr R. C. Majumdar; Dist. Gazetteer , 1915, p 26; Some Historical Aspects of the Inscriptions of Bengal, Dr B. C. Sen, p 342, fn 1.)
  • ^ "The Pal Kings of Bengal" in Calcutta Review, June 1874, pp 74, 95, 96, E. Vesey Westmacott, Bengal Civil Service, Bengal Asiatic Society of Royal Asiatic Society, F.R.G.S.).
  • ^ "The Pal Kings of Bengal" in Calcutta Review, June 1874, pp 74, 95, 96, E. Vesey Westmacott, Bengal Civil Service, Bengal Asiatic Society of Royal Asiatic Society, F.R.G.S.
  • ^ The Kafirs of the Hindukush, 1896, pp 75–85; A Passage to Nurestan explaining the mysteries of Afghan Hinterland, 2006, p 80, I. B. Tauris, Nicholas Barrington, Joseph T. Kenderick, Reinhard Schlangitweit, Sardy Gall.
  • ^ The Káfirs of the Hindu-Kush, 1896, pp 71–77, George Scott Robertson — Nuristani (Asian people).
  • ^ NOTE: According to Persiacs-9, in the 7th century, the Kabol area (i.e Kabol, Kapisa, Lamghan, etc.) was the stronghold of the Iranian cis-Hindkush Kambojas whose influence extended as far as Arachosia/Kandhahar (See: Early East Iran and Arthaveda, 1981, p 92 sqq, Dr Michael Witzel).
  • ^ For example: King Ashoka''s Rock Edicts at Shahbazgarhi and Mansehra list the Kambojas among the Yonas and Gandharas as the most eminent clan of this region, i.e., Kabul/Kapisa/Swat.
  • ^ From the Grant Charters of Pala kings of Bengal, we learn that a Kamboja dynasty was ruling in the Kabul Valley and north-west India in the 9th century AD. Pala King Devapala (reign AD 810 – 850) had led his war expedition sometime after AD 810 against the Hunas (probably located south west Punjab ... which probably formed a part of the kingdom of Zabulistan) and the Kambojas (probably Kabul/Kapisa Shahi dynasty), as is amply testified by Pala king Devapala''s Monghyr Charter (B-8, i.e: Kambojesu cha yasya vajiyuvbhih ...kantashchiran dikshitah: see Epigraphia Indica, XVII p 305). These were the people who have also been known by different names like the Kabulis/Gandharas or Kambojas but they were of the Kamboja lineage/race, ethically speaking.
  • ^ According to Sata-pañcāśaddesa-vibhaga of Saktisamgma Tantra, Book III, Ch VII, v 24–28 (a medieval era Tantra text), the Kambojas are said to be located to west of South-west Kashmir (Pir-pañcāla), to South of Bactria, and to east of Maha-Mlechcha-desa (Mohammadan countries i.e Khorasan/Iran). Likewise verse 42–44 of the same reference locates the medieval Huna-desa to the north of Maru-desa (Rajputana) and to the south of Kama-giri (Kama hills) (See Ref: Geography of Ancient and Medieval India, 1971, p 100-102, 108, Dr D. C. Sircar). The Kama/kamma is the name of hilly territory of eastern Afghanistan, lying between Jalalabad and Khyber pass. Hence, the general location of Huna-desa may indeed have comprised south-western Punjab and parts of Southern and Central Afghanistan which territory again was same as the Zabulistan of Arab writers.
  • ^ Proceedings and Transactions of the All-India Oriental Conference, 1930, p 108, Dr J. C. Vidyalankar (All-India Oriental Conference); The Cultural Heritage of India: Sri Ramakrishna Centenary Memorial, 1936, p 135, Dr S. K. Chatterjee, Sri Ramakrishna Centenary Committee.
  • ^ Bhartya Itihaas ki Ruprekha, p 534, Dr J. C. Vidyalankar; Ancient Kamboja, People and the Country, 1981, pp 129, 300, Dr J. L. Kamboj.
  • ^ Cf: The History and Culture of the Indian People, 1977, pp 165 sqq, Dr Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Dr A. D. Pusalkar — India.
  • ^ History and Culture of Indian People, Vol II, and several other noted authorities identify Kapisa kingdom a part of ancient cis-Hindukush Kamboja (See: The History and Culture of the Indian People, Vol II, 1977, p 122, Dr Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Dr Achut Dattatraya Pusalker, Dr Asoke Kumar Majumdar — India.
  • ^ Si-yu-ki: Buddhist Records of the Western World, 1906 edition, pp 50, 54, Samuel Beal.
  • ^ Rajatarangini 4.164–166.
  • ^ For identification of Kumijis with Kambojas, see: India and Central Asia, p 25, Dr P. C. Bagchi; Prācīna Kamboja, Jana aur Janapada =: Ancient Kamboja, People and Country, 1981, pp 300, 401, Jiyālāla Kāmboja, Satyavrat Śāstrī. The tribal name Kumiji may also be compared to Camoji/Caumojee or Kamoje Kafir tribes of the Hindukush as referred to by Elphinstone (An Account of the Kingdom of Caubul) and Kams/Kamoz as mentioned by George Scott Robertson (The Kafirs of the Hindukush). The Kafir tribes Kamojis/Kamozis of the Hindukush represent the relics of the ancient Kambojas. For Kamoj/Kamoji people of Hindukush and their relations with ancient Kambojas, See: Wishnu Purana, p 374, fn, H. H. Wilson; The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, p 127, Charles Frederick Oldham; Peter Weiss: Von existentialistischen Drama zum marxistischen Welttheater ..., 1971, Otto F. Best; Geographical and Economic Studies in the Mahābhārata: Upāyana Parva, 1945, p 131, Moti Chandra; The Living Age, 1873, p 781; Mountstuart Elphinstone, "An account of the kingdom of Caubol", fn p 619; Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, 1843, p 140; Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1874, p 260 fn; Die altpersischen Keilinschriften: Im Grundtexte mit Uebersetzung, Grammatik und Glossar, 1881, p 86, Friedrich Spiegel; Political History of Ancient India, 1996, p 133, fn, Dr H. C. Raychaudhury, Dr B. N. Banerjee; The Achaemenids and India, 1974, p 13, Dr S Chattopadhyaya.
  • ^ Quoted in: India and Central Asia, p 25, Dr P. C. Bagchi; The Achamenids in India, p 7 by Dr S. Chattopadhya, where the author identifies the Kambojas as of Turko-Iranian stock; cf also: The Indian Historical Quarterly, 1963, p 192, India; Cf: Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Poona, 1928, pp 130,138, Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, which connects the Kambhojas with Tartar ethnics.
  • ^ Some writers have gone to the extent of designating these 11th-century Pamirian Kumijis (the remnants of ancient Kambojas of Pamirs/Hindukush) as extractions from the Hephthalites (See: History of Civilizations of Central Asia, 1999, p 102, Dr Ahmad Hasan Dani, Vadim Mikhaĭlovich Masson, János Harmatta, Boris Abramovich Litvinovskiĭ, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, Unesco — Asia, Central.
  • ^ There are numerous references to Kambojas and Tukharas (Turukshakas) being bracketed together as allied tribes or as neighboring tribes located in Central Asia. See: Tukhara Kingdom. The Tukharas/Tusharas had also joined the Kamboja army and fought the Kurukshetra war under the supreme command of Kamboja Sudakshina (MBH 5.19.21–23; The Nations of India at the Battle Between the Pandavas and Kauravas, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1908, pp 313, 331, Dr F. E. Pargiter; (See: Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland). As noted above, as late as the 8th century AD, the Kambojas and Tukharas are attested to be immediate neighbors in around Oxus (Rajatarangini 4.164–166).
  • ^ IMPORTANT COMMENT: As noted above, the Kambojas and the Tukharas/Turukshakas, for long time, had co-existed in the former Kamboja/Tukharistan country and thus, their culture, customs, mannerism and dress had become shared over the time. Thus, it is but natural that some writers make mistakes in identifying these remnants of ancient Kambojas of the Pamirs/Hindukush with the Turks or the Hephthalites.
  • ^ There are even some noted scholars who identify the Kambojas as a branch of the Tukharas (See for example: Buddhism in Central Asia, 1987, p 90, Dr B. N. Puri — Buddhism).
  • ^ See: Si-yu-ki, Buddhist Records of the Western World, 1906, p c (Introduction), Samuel Beal.
  • ^ The Pathans, 1958, p 101, Olaf Caroe.
  • ^ See: The Maha-Bodhi, p 181, Maha Bodhi Society, Calcutta — Buddhism; Ancient Indian History and Culture, 1974, p 149, Shripad Rama Sharma — India; Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, April 1903, p 369, M Anesaki; The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, p 125, Charles Frederick Oldham — Serpent worship.
  • ^ See entry Varman in Monier Williams, Sanskrit-English Dictionary; see also entry Varman in: Cologne Digital Sanskrit English Dictionary)
  • ^ "Varman" is the virtual name ending of a Kshatriya in India (See: Some Aspects of Asian History and Culture, 1986, p 17, Upendra Thakur.
  • ^ For "Varman" being a Kshatriya surname, see also: Inscriptions of Orissa, 1997, p 25, Snigdha Tripathy, Indian Council of Historical Research, Indian council of historical research).
  • ^ Cf: Surname Sarman always indicated a Brahmana and Varman a Ksatriya (See: Concise History of Ancient India, 1977, p 43, Asoke Kumar Majumdar).
  • ^ For Chinese Buddhist records referencing Guna Varman, see reference: J.R.A.S., April 1903, p 369, M. Anesaki. From the account of Guna Varman as referenced in Chinese Buddhist Records, there were Hindu (Ksatriya) kings in Kabul/Kapisa more than two centuries before Hiuen Tsang''s arrival in AD 631 (644/45 in Kapis) when he found a Ksatriya king upon the throne of Afghanistan (See: The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, p 125, Charles Frederick Oldham).
  • ^ Mudrarakshasa act II; History of Poros, 1967, p 89, Dr Buddha Prakash.
  • ^ A History of Zoroastrianism, 1991, p 136, Mary Boyce, Frantz Grenet; Mauryan Samrajya Ka Itihaas, Hindi, 1927, p 665-67 by Dr Sataketu Vidyalankar; Hindu Polity, A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times, 1978, p 117-121, Dr K. P. Jayswal; Ancient India, 2003, pp 839–40, Dr V. D. Mahajan; Northern India, p 42, Dr Mehta Vasisitha Dev Mohan etc.
  • ^ History of Punjab, Vol I, 1997, p 225, Dr Buddha Prakash; Raja Poros, 1990, p 9, Publication Bureau, Punjabi University Patiala.
  • ^ Raghuvamsa, 4.67–70, Kalidasa.
  • ^ The Bhishma Parva of the Mahabharata, which is supposed to have been edited around the 4th or 5th century AD, in one of its verses mentions the Hunas with the Parasikas and other Mlechha tribes of the northwest including the Kambojas, Yavanas, Chinas, Darunas, Sukritvahas, Kulatthas, etc.HrishIvidarbhah kantikasta~Nganah parata~Nganah. | uttarashchapare mlechchhA jana bharatasattama. || 63 || YavanAshcha sa Kamboja Daruna mlechchha jatayah. | Sakahaddruhah Kuntalashcha Hunah Parasikas saha.|| 64 || Tathaiva maradhAahchinastathaiva dasha malikah. | Kshatriyopaniveshashcha vaishyashudra kulani cha.|| 65 ||(Mahabharata 6.9.63–65) .
  • ^ Early History of India, p 339, Dr V. A. Smith; See also Early Empire of Central Asia (1939), W. M. McGovern.
  • ^ Devapala''s Monghyr Charter (B-8), Epigraphia Indica, XVII p 305; The History of the Gurjara-Pratihāras, 1957, p 62, Dr B. N. Puri; Ancient India, 2003, p 650, Dr V. D. Mahajan; History and Culture of Indian People, The Age of Imperial Kanauj, p 50, Dr R. C. Majumdar, Dr A. D. Pusalkar.
  • ^ Book III, Ch VII, v 24–28.
  • ^ Book III, Ch VII, v 42–44.
  • ^ Raj Shekhar Chapter 17, Kavy Mimansa.
  • ^ Cf: The Sun and the Serpent: A Contribution to the History of Serpent-worship, 1905, p 125, Charles Frederick Olmsted.
  • ^ Darius used titles like "Kshayathiya, Kshayathiya Kshayathiyanam" etc.,
  • ^ Sakas used titles like "Sahi and Sahanusahi".
  • ^ Kushanas used the grandiloquent title like "daivaputra-sahi.sahanu.sahi", "Shaonano shao", and "Shao".
  • ^ The Hunas had the title "Shāhi".
  • ^ The title "Shahi" appears on Indo-Bactrian coins.
  • ^ "Shahi of Kalhana''s Rajatrangini, Shahiya of Alberuni and Sahi of the inscriptions".
  • ^ The Shahi Afghanistan and Punjab, 1973, pp 1, 45–46, 48, 80, Dr D. B. Pandey; The Śakas in India and Their Impact on Indian Life and Culture, 1976, p 80, Vishwa Mitra Mohan – Indo-Scythians; Country, Culture and Political life in early and medieval India, 2004, p 34, Daud Ali.
  • ^ Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, 1954, pp 112 ff; The Shahis of Afghanistan and Punjab, 1973, p 46, Dr D. B. Pandey; The Śakas in India and Their Impact on Indian Life and Culture, 1976, p 80, Vishwa Mitra Mohan — Indo-Scythians.
  • ^ India, A History, 2001, p 203, John Keay.
  • ^ J.B.B.R.A.S., 139ff; J.B.O.R.S, xvi, 233, 293; Political History of Ancient India, 1996, p 383, Dr H. C. Raychaudhury; Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen Gesellschaft 34, pp 247ff, 262; Indian Antiquary, X, 222; Jaina Journal, V-22, 1987–88, p 107; The Śakas in India, 1981, p 23, Satya Shrava; Mālwa in Post-Maurya Period, 1981, p 41, Manika Chakrabarti — Malwa (Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, India).
  • ^ The Shahis of Afghanistan and the Punjab, 1973, p 1, Dr Deena Bandhu Pandey.
  • ^ The former Kafirs like Aspins of Chitral and Ashkuns or Yashkuns of Gilgit are identified as the modern representatives of the Pāṇinian Aśvakayanas (Greek: Assakenoi); and the Asip/Isap or Yusufzai (from Aspa.zai) in the Kabul valley (between river Kabul and Indus) are believed to be modern representatives of the Pāṇinian Aśvayanas (Greek: Aspasioi) respectively (See: The Quarterly Review, 1873, p 537, William Gifford, George Walter Prothero, John Gibson Lockhart, John Murray, Whitwell Elwin, John Taylor Coleridge, Rowland Edmund Prothero Ernle, William Macpherson, William Smith; An Inquiry Into the Ethnography of Afghanistan, 1893, p 75, Henry Walter Bellew; Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1864, p 681, by Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; The Invasion of India by Alexander the Great, 1896, p 334, John Watson M''Crindle; Evolution of Heroic Tradition in Ancient Panjab, 1971, p 72; History of Punjab, Publication Bureau Punjabi University Patiala, 1997, p 225, Dr Buddha Prakash; A Comprehensive History of India, Vol II, p 118, Dr Nilkantha Shastri; See also: Ancient Kamboja, People & the Country, 1981, p 278, These Kamboj People, 1979, pp 119–20, K. S. Dardi etc.
  • ^ NOTE: The Aspasios and Assaekoi clans of Kunar/Swat valleys are stated to be sub-sections of the Kambojas who were especially engaged in horse-culture and were expert horsemen (Asva.yuddhah-kushalah). See: Ashvakas. See also: Mahabharata 12.101.5, Kumbhakonam Ed.; See also: Hindu Polity, 1955, p 140, Dr K. P. Jayswal).
  • ^ See: Glossary of Tribes and Castes of Punjab and North West Frontier Province, 1910, Vol III, p 524, H. A. Rose.
  • ^ Note: No systematic excavation of the area has so far been made in the Kabul Shahi realm, but the sporadic finds made in the region affirm the spread of Hindu influence at the cost of Buddhism during the period spanning AD 600–900. The replacement of Buddhist kingship with Hindu kingship around AD 870 seems to symbolize the Brahmanization of the so-called Turk kings as well as the population south of the Hindukush. A Brahmanised king named Kallar started the Hindu Shahi dynasty of Gandhara (Cf: The Afghans, 2002, p 183, W. Vogelsang;

    Tags:1888, 1927, Abbasid, Abbasid Caliphate, Achaemenid, Achaemenid Empire, Afghan, Afghanistan, Alexander the Great, Allahabad, Arab, Arachosia, Asia, Bactria, Balochistan, Bangladesh, Bengal, Bhutan, Biruni, Bost, Britain, British, British Museum, Bronze Age, Buddha, Buddhism, Calcutta, Caliphate, Capital, Central Asia, Chinese, Christian, Cultural Heritage, Delhi, Dutch, Dynasty, Emirates, French, Gandhara, Geography, Greco, Greek, Herat, Hinduism, Hotaki, Ilkhanate, India, Indus, Indus River, Iran, Iranian, Iraq, Ireland, Islam, Islamic, Islamic Republic, Jalalabad, Kabul, Kapisa, Kashmir, Khanate, Khorasan, Lahore, Life, Maldives, Mamluk, Maritime, Maru, Medes, Mitra, Monarchy, Mughal, Mughal Empire, Mughals, Muslim, Nations, Nepal, Outline, Oxus, Oxus civilization, Pakistan, Parthian, Parthian Empire, Persia, Persian, Peshawar, Portuguese, Post, Rashidun, Ray, Safavids, Saffarid, Samanid, Sanskrit, Sassanian, Sassanid, Satrap, Sayyid, Science, Scythians, Seleucid, Shah, Shahi, Sri Lanka, Sultan, Sun, Tibet, Timeline, Timurids, Turk, Turkish, Turks, Umayyad, Vedic, Wikipedia, Zoroastrian

  • Shahi Media

    Shahi Terms

    Shahi Articles

    Shahi Your Feedback